Maps
Magazine

LEGAL

ATC Questions Legality of Bail in Torture Case Against Town Chairman
Karachi ATC grilled investigators on Farhan Ghani’s release in a case of torture on govt employees against Town Chairman Chanesar. Court adjourned till Sept 30, summoning witnesses.
MH
by Muhammad Hashir
2025-09-22
ATC Questions Legality of Bail in Torture Case Against Town Chairman

The Anti-Terrorism Court (ATC) on Monday raised serious questions regarding the release of accused Farhan Ghani in the case involving torture on government employees linked to Town Chairman Chanesar.

During proceedings, the court inquired under which section the accused had been released and ordered the case record to be presented. Farhan Ghani, along with other accused and lawyers, appeared before the court.

The investigating officer informed the bench that two witnesses had recorded their statements on August 24, confirming that government work was stopped. The court expressed concern and asked whether the release of the accused during investigation was permissible under terrorism charges.

The defense lawyer attempted to intervene but was told by the judge to remain patient. The court pressed further, questioning the legal grounds for bail and remand in such a case.

The prosecutor maintained that while obstruction of official work occurred, no act of terrorism had taken place. “The special anti-terrorism law will not be applicable in this case,” the prosecutor said, adding that the matter would not qualify as an ATC case.

The defense argued that if Section 497 was not applicable, then terrorism charges should be abolished. The court, however, reminded the defense that reconciliation is not allowed under anti-terrorism law and sought clarification on the legal standing of recorded statements.

The judge expressed displeasure at the investigating officer, questioning his understanding of the law. “Have you read the law or not?” the judge asked, noting contradictions in the investigation.

The court announced it would summon the plaintiff at the next hearing. However, the plaintiff’s lawyer said his client belonged to a sensitive organization and instead offered to present witnesses.

The hearing was adjourned until September 30, with the court ordering witnesses to be summoned for testimony.
Tagged:

Karachi

ATC

TerrorismCase

PakistanLaw
Share News: