POLITICS & POLICY MAKING
Former Federal Minister and Senator Faisal Vawda has questioned the role of the federal cabinet in major financial decisions, including the allocation of £190 million and the controversial purchase of vehicles worth Rs. 6 billion for Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) officers. Speaking during a Senate meeting, Vawda criticized the lack of transparency and accused the government of financial mismanagement.
Cabinet Decisions Under Fire
Addressing the Senate, Vawda pointed out inconsistencies in the government’s financial policies. He stated, “The decision to allocate £190 million and the purchase of vehicles were both approved by the cabinet, yet we are now being held accountable for decisions that benefited Pakistan’s treasury by crores of rupees.”
He further claimed that the Finance Minister and the ruling Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) defended these decisions, despite alternative, more cost-effective options being available.
Criticism of Vehicle Purchases
Vawda highlighted the controversial procurement of 1,010 vehicles worth Rs. 6 billion for FBR officers. He alleged that there was no public advertisement or proper justification for the purchase. “The Finance Committee is being accused of influencing this decision, and the defense of this purchase only points to favoritism,” he added.
In a recent Senate Standing Committee on Finance meeting, strong objections were raised over the vehicle procurement. FBR Chairman defended the decision, citing operational requirements for young officers as the primary reason for the purchase.
Allegations of Favoritism
Vawda alleged favoritism in the decision-making process, accusing the Defense Minister of protecting individuals favored by others in power. “Theft and hooliganism have become the norm in this country,” he remarked, reflecting frustration over the state of governance.
Background
The decision to purchase vehicles has been a contentious issue, drawing criticism from opposition leaders and public policy experts alike. FBR justified the move as a necessity to enhance operational efficiency, but many have questioned the rationale behind such an expensive procurement amid economic challenges.
The allocation of £190 million has also been a point of contention, with critics questioning the transparency and accountability of cabinet-approved decisions.
Call for Accountability
Vawda’s remarks have reignited calls for greater scrutiny of government financial decisions, particularly those involving large expenditures. As debates over these issues continue, the government faces mounting pressure to ensure transparency and accountability in its financial practices.